PUBLIC FORUMS/OFF TOPIC FORUM

Topic Title: Protests and Suggestions (Simple Topic)

Topic starter: Griffin Vengance

Topic started: 14:47:37 16th Feb 2006

Posts: 5 Last post: 05:20:40 17th Feb 2006 by Infernal Shadow

Griffin Vengance Posted: 14:47:37 16th Feb 2006

Posts: 3292

Topics: 197

Location: United Kingdom

Gender: Male



1) Lady's Tea Club
Well, it was all well and funny to start with, but Prof please. It's been going on for quite a bit now, and although I won't doubt that you earned those points, a one man clan doesn't count as a clan. Looking at the Clan Leaderboards, one could be forgiven to think that the game has gone corrupt. :hellno:

2) Turrets.
Well, I suppose January/February were going to be trial months. Everything seems to be going relatively smoothly...except the small matter of turrets.
The highest defence I've seen so far is 180 million=180 turrets. Hundreds of trained fighters, perhaps even a fleet of 1000 untrained.
A bit too much if you ask me.
So, when the topic of another couple of changes is debated...I suggest chaning the required defence for a turret to 5 million. H/W attacks should be difficult and costly, not practically impossible and taking an hour.




__________________________
00:01:23 | Griffin Vengance has been defeated by Shadow Stalker.

Proof that nagging really does work!

Filas Posted: 14:52:40 16th Feb 2006

Posts: 2042

Topics: 148

Location: Lithuania



"The highest defence I've seen so far is 180 million"

where have you seen such planet? As if you really seen such defence it should be a bug, as according to current formulas biggest possible defence can be around 167mln I think.


"Hundreds of trained fighters, perhaps even a fleet of 1000 untrained.
A bit too much if you ask me. "

if you want someone to ask you about this, you need to try attacking turrets many times and know exactly how many trained or untrained fighters is needed.
I can tell you that for destroying max amount of turrets on planet you won't need more trained max fighters than assaults needed to take out that planet defences :)




__________________________
Country music, whiskey and OK

Zerohours Posted: 14:59:58 16th Feb 2006

Posts: 2443

Topics: 287

Location: Canada

Gender: Male



ya it makes sense......points shouldnt be just walk in and take em....you should have to kill all the turrets.....it saves troops adn energy




__________________________
I am here to help in anyway I can! Let's have fun!

Griffin Vengance Posted: 15:20:56 16th Feb 2006

Posts: 3292

Topics: 197

Location: United Kingdom

Gender: Male



Well, I think it was 180 million. You're probably right Filas.

And I haven't attacked any h/ws recently, so my estimates are a little rusty. :shrug:

However, considering how often I've failed to scrath 0:0:0, I know it'd be a pain in the butt. :S

(whoops; wrong forum. Moderators? Pretty please?)




__________________________
00:01:23 | Griffin Vengance has been defeated by Shadow Stalker.

Proof that nagging really does work!

andy1218 Posted: 19:16:53 16th Feb 2006

Posts: 2768

Topics: 75

Location: Canada

Gender: Male



If there was a lower limit on the amount of uranium on a planet....then it'll be better. At least for me it will. :P


Infernal Shadow Posted: 05:20:40 17th Feb 2006

Posts: 2410

Topics: 184

Gender: Male



lol a little off :D




__________________________
This Useless Post Was Brought To You By Infernal Shadow

Power corrupts. Absolute power is even more fun

Previous 1  Next

© SkyLords 2002-2024 | SkyLords™ is Trademark worldwide | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Contact Us | Game FAQ
PUBLIC FORUMS
TICKETS
LANGUAGE FORUMS
SKYLORDS CHAT